Sep. 23rd, 2009

whispercricket: (Default)
Over the years, I've read bits and pieces of information about cell phones and radiation (or microwaves, or wireless networks, etc.). Mostly, what I saw was vague (or extreme) enough that I moved most electric items away from the bed, told myself that I needed to use a headset for my phone, tried to stay back from the microwave when it was on just in case, and sort of forgot about the rest.

However yesterday, [ profile] lilairen mentioned an environmentally-focused blog that she sometimes reads, and paging back through its archives randomly, I found an entry called "10 Ways to Limit Health Risk from Cell Phones".

Well, if the French (and other countries) are banning cell phone use in their public elementary schools, then that's interesting...I had also heard that at least one Canadian university had decided not to roll out a WiFi network due to potential health concerns (the radiation, it's everywhere! O.O).

Even more alarming was the report (which I thought was linked off the DailyGreen entry, but now doesn't seem to be - how odd) called Cellphones and Brain Tumors: 15 Reasons for Concern (Science, Spin, and the Truth Behind Interphone). I haven't done any checking as to what dissenting responses may exist to the report (happy to get that information), but the report at least is endorsed by a range of scientists, doctors, etc - not just one or two specific people. I found its review of the data to be a bit alarming but not alarmist or sensationalized - I would be very interested in knowing other people's reactions as well.

An inset quote from the report: “In a world where a drug cannot be launched without proof that it is safe, where the use of herbs and natural compounds available to all since Egyptian times are now questioned, their safety subjected to the deepest scrutiny, where a new food cannot be launched without prior approval, the idea that we can use mobile telephony, including masts, and introduce WiFi and mobile phones without restrictions around our 5 year olds is double-standards gone mad. I speak, not just as an editor and scientist that has looked in depth at all the research, but as a father that lost his beloved daughter to a brain tumour.” Chris Woollams, Editor, Integrated Cancer and Oncology News, Icon Magazine

The report also notes that the effects of cell phone radiation are the sort that would build up over time and amount of exposure, and it's really just getting to the point where 10+ year studies or reviews can actually be attempted.

Both pages had some suggestions for reducing your exposure to cell phone radiation (which I mostly combined into one list):

Steps to reduce exposure )


whispercricket: (Default)

February 2017

121314151617 18

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 26th, 2017 02:09 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios